Purvis v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
This text of 52 F. App'x 629 (Purvis v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pamela S. Purvis appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation to uphold the Administrative Law Judge’s denial of her claim for Social Security disability benefits and Social Security income. We must uphold the decision to deny disability benefits if it is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000); Craig v. Chater, 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir.1996). We have reviewed the administrative record, the district court’s order, and the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly we affirm on the reasoning of the district court and the magistrate judge. Purvis v. Comm’r of the Soc. Sec. Admin., No. CA-00-1052 (M.D.N.C. May 1, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 F. App'x 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/purvis-v-commissioner-of-the-social-security-administration-ca4-2002.