Purvis v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railroad

68 A. 189, 219 Pa. 195, 1907 Pa. LEXIS 636
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 14, 1907
DocketAppeal, No. 150
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 68 A. 189 (Purvis v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Purvis v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railroad, 68 A. 189, 219 Pa. 195, 1907 Pa. LEXIS 636 (Pa. 1907).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is a hard case and appellant’s counsel has presented a very able argument to take it out of the general rule that to get on or off a moving train is negligence per se. We have re-examined the authorities to see if it can be brought within the exceptions, but it cannot consistently be done. The rule is founded on solid considerations of public policy for the safety of the traveling community, the exceptions are few in number and the cases must come very clearly within them. The learned judge below has discussed the law and the facts very fully and accurately and, on his opinion, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Daniel v. Pennsylvania R.
72 F. Supp. 15 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 A. 189, 219 Pa. 195, 1907 Pa. LEXIS 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/purvis-v-buffalo-rochester-pittsburg-railroad-pa-1907.