Purvis v. . Bean

136 S.E. 926, 193 N.C. 835, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 478
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 9, 1927·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The controversy on trial narrowed itself to issues of fact, which the jury alone could determine. A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the case was heard and determined substantially in accord with the principles of law applicable, and that the validity of the trial should be sustained. All matters in dispute have been settled by the verdict, and no action or ruling on the part of the trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible or prejudicial error. The case presents no new question of law, or one not heretofore settled by our decisions. Tillotson v. Currin, 176 N. C., 479.

The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Purvis v. . Bean, 136 S.E. 926, 193 N.C. 835, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 478 (N.C. 1927).

136 S.E. 926 (Purvis v. . Bean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tillotson v. . Currin
97 S.E. 395 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1918)