Purvis ex rel. Purvis v. Whitaker
This text of 77 S.E.2d 682 (Purvis ex rel. Purvis v. Whitaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An examination of tbe complaint in connection with tbe portions thereof sought to be stricken leads to tbe conclusion that tbe ruling of tbe trial judge should be upheld. Tbe allegations complained of were relevant and tended to set forth facts material to a proper statement of plaintiffs’ cause of action. Garrett v. Rose, 236 N.C. 299, 72 S.E. 2d 843; Ledford v. Transportation Co., 237 N.C. 317, 74 S.E. 2d 653. Furthermore, defendants’ motion to strike was filed after their demurrer bad been overruled. G.S. 1-153. Parrish v. R. R., 221 N.C. 292, 20 S.E. 2d 299. Appellees’ motion to dismiss tbe appeal on tbis ground is allowed.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 S.E.2d 682, 238 N.C. 262, 1953 N.C. LEXIS 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/purvis-ex-rel-purvis-v-whitaker-nc-1953.