Purvis ex rel. Purvis v. Whitaker

77 S.E.2d 682, 238 N.C. 262, 1953 N.C. LEXIS 428
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 23, 1953·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

An examination of tbe complaint in connection with tbe portions thereof sought to be stricken leads to tbe conclusion that tbe ruling of tbe trial judge should be upheld. Tbe allegations complained of were relevant and tended to set forth facts material to a proper statement of plaintiffs’ cause of action. Garrett v. Rose, 236 N.C. 299, 72 S.E. 2d 843; Ledford v. Transportation Co., 237 N.C. 317, 74 S.E. 2d 653. Furthermore, defendants’ motion to strike was filed after their demurrer bad been overruled. G.S. 1-153. Parrish v. R. R., 221 N.C. 292, 20 S.E. 2d 299. Appellees’ motion to dismiss tbe appeal on tbis ground is allowed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Purvis ex rel. Purvis v. Whitaker, 77 S.E.2d 682, 238 N.C. 262, 1953 N.C. LEXIS 428 (N.C. 1953).

77 S.E.2d 682 (Purvis ex rel. Purvis v. Whitaker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ledford v. Marion Transportation Co.
74 S.E.2d 653 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Garrett v. Rose
72 S.E.2d 843 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)
Parrish v. . R. R.
20 S.E.2d 299 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)