Purvin v. Grey

268 A.D. 1005, 52 N.Y.S.2d 786, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4648
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Purvin v. Grey. Read the opinion of the Court — 267 A.D. 815

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for fraud and deceit, defendant moved for an order dismissing the complaint for insufficiency or, in the alternative, to strike out certain allegations of the complaint as sham and frivolous, and for other relief. The motion was denied, and defendant appeals. Order insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Hag-arty, Carswell and Johnston, JJ., concur; Close, P. J., and Aldrich, J., dissent and vote to reverse the order and to grant the motion to dismiss the complaint, with leave to plead over, on the ground that the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. [See post, p. 1051.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Purvin v. Grey, 268 A.D. 1005, 52 N.Y.S.2d 786, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4648 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

268 A.D. 1005 (Purvin v. Grey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.