Purugganan v. State
This text of Purugganan v. State (Purugganan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAOT-XX-XXXXXXX 08-MAY-2020 10:20 AM
NO. CAOT-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
BRIAN NOBU PURUGGANAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent-Appellee.
ORDER DISMISSING CASE NUMBER CAOT-XX-XXXXXXX FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND DISMISSING ALL PENDING MOTIONS AS MOOT (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and Wadsworth, JJ.) Upon consideration of the non-conforming petition that Petitioner Brian Nobu Purugganan (Purugganan) filed against Respondent-Appellee State of Hawai#i (the State) on December 26, 2019, in case number CAOT-XX-XXXXXXX, it appears Purugganan is attempting to invoke original jurisdiction in the Intermediate Court of Appeals. Pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes § 602-57 (2016), the Intermediate Court of Appeals does not have original jurisdiction to address Purugganan's December 26, 2019 petition. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that CAOT-XX-XXXXXXX is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that all pending motions in CAOT-XX-XXXXXXX are dismissed as moot. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 8, 2020.
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge
/s/ Katherine G. Leonard Associate Judge
/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Purugganan v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/purugganan-v-state-hawapp-2020.