Purtell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Purtell v. State

93 S.E. 227, 20 Ga. App. 723, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1051

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedAugust 3, 1917

Docket8893

StatusPublished

This text of 93 S.E. 227 (Purtell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Purtell v. State, 93 S.E. 227, 20 Ga. App. 723, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1051 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Wade, O. J.

1. The evidence supported the verdict; and in the absence of any timely request in writing for fuller or more specific instructions, the charge of the court sufficiently covered the issues in the case; and there is no substantial merit in any of the assignments of error, when • considered in connection with the answer of the trial judge and with the brief of evidence.

2. The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

George and Luke, JJ., concur..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wade, O. J.

1. The evidence supported the verdict; and in the absence of any timely request in writing for fuller or more specific instructions, the charge of the court sufficiently covered the issues in the case; and there is no substantial merit in any of the assignments of error, when • considered in connection with the answer of the trial judge and with the brief of evidence.

2. The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

George and Luke, JJ., concur..

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 S.E. 227, 20 Ga. App. 723, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/purtell-v-state-gactapp-1917.