Purta v. Cisz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Purta v. Cisz

47 A.D.2d 850, 368 N.Y.S.2d 814, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9197

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 24, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 47 A.D.2d 850 (Purta v. Cisz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Purta v. Cisz, 47 A.D.2d 850, 368 N.Y.S.2d 814, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9197 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to declare a deed made by plaintiffs’ testator to be a forgery, plaintiffs appeal from an order-judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated May 6, 1974, which is in favor of defendant, after a nonjury trial. Order-judgment affirmed, with costs. Even if the Trial Justice’s statement that plaintiffs had the burden of establishing the validity of the releases in issue were to be deemed erroneous, upon the proof adduced we find that defendant did in fact prove the validity by a fair preponderance of the credible evidence. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Munder and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to declare a deed made by plaintiffs’ testator to be a forgery, plaintiffs appeal from an order-judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated May 6, 1974, which is in favor of defendant, after a nonjury trial. Order-judgment affirmed, with costs. Even if the Trial Justice’s statement that plaintiffs had the burden of establishing the validity of the releases in issue were to be deemed erroneous, upon the proof adduced we find that defendant did in fact prove the validity by a fair preponderance of the credible evidence. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Munder and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A.D.2d 850, 368 N.Y.S.2d 814, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/purta-v-cisz-nyappdiv-1975.