PURSHE KAPLAN STERLING INVESTMENTS, INC. v. NEFF
This text of PURSHE KAPLAN STERLING INVESTMENTS, INC. v. NEFF (PURSHE KAPLAN STERLING INVESTMENTS, INC. v. NEFF) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________
PURSHE KAPLAN STERLING : INVESTMENTS, INC., JOHN PETER : PURCELL, KATHERINE FLOUTON, and : LISA LAFOND : Plaintiffs, : : v. : No. 5:20-cv-00878 : TONI CAIAZZO NEFF, : Defendant : __________________________________________
O R D E R AND NOW, this 9th day of September, 2020, upon consideration of the motion for preliminary injunctive relief, ECF No. 7, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. The motion, ECF No. 7, is GRANTED. Neff is precluded from continuing her FINRA arbitration during the pendency of this litigation and said preclusion will continue unless relief from this court is granted at a future date. 2. In accordance with the provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(c), and for the reasons stated in the Opinion, the Court exercises its discretion and waives the bond requirement for Plaintiffs. See Temple Univ. v. White, 941 F.2d 201, 219 (3d Cir. 1991).
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr.__________ JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
PURSHE KAPLAN STERLING INVESTMENTS, INC. v. NEFF, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/purshe-kaplan-sterling-investments-inc-v-neff-paed-2020.