Purser v. Weinstock & Scavo, P.C.

325 F. App'x 902
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 27, 2009·No. No. 09-10635·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

For the reasons stated in the district court’s dispositive order of January 8, 2009, we agree that appellant failed to state a claim for relief under the Fair Debt Collection Act. Further, we find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s decision [903] not to exercise its supplemental jurisdiction and to dismiss appellant’s state law claims without prejudice.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Purser v. Weinstock & Scavo, P.C., 325 F. App'x 902 (11th Cir. 2009).

325 F. App'x 902 (Purser v. Weinstock & Scavo, P.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.