Purser v. Weinstock & Scavo, P.C.
This text of 325 F. App'x 902 (Purser v. Weinstock & Scavo, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
For the reasons stated in the district court’s dispositive order of January 8, 2009, we agree that appellant failed to state a claim for relief under the Fair Debt Collection Act. Further, we find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s decision [903]*903not to exercise its supplemental jurisdiction and to dismiss appellant’s state law claims without prejudice.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
325 F. App'x 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/purser-v-weinstock-scavo-pc-ca11-2009.