Purser v. Purser

61 S.E.2d 503, 207 Ga. 335, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 486
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 11, 1950
DocketNo. 17234
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 61 S.E.2d 503 (Purser v. Purser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Purser v. Purser, 61 S.E.2d 503, 207 Ga. 335, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 486 (Ga. 1950).

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

The exception here is to a judgment overruling a demurrer to a petition filed by the husband within thirty days after the judgment of divorce, alimony, and custody of the minor child to the wife, seeking to modify that judgment as to alimony and custody; and no approved brief of evidence is made a part of the petition. Held:

The law presumes that the evidence showed that the mother was a proper person to have custody and entitled to the alimony allowed. To constitute good and sufficient grounds to modify that judgment, the petition should contain an approved brief of the evidence, rebutting this presumption. In the absence of such evidence, no grounds for modification were alleged, and the court erred in overruling the general demurrer thereto. Allison v. Allison, 204 Ga. 202 (48 S. E. 2d, 723); Huguley v. Huguley, 204 Ga. 692 (51 S. E. 2d, 445). The subsequent judgment of modification is therefore nugatory.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hammock v. Hammock
74 S.E.2d 859 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 S.E.2d 503, 207 Ga. 335, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/purser-v-purser-ga-1950.