Purpura Bros. v. Oxner

40 So. 2d 890, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 1431
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 17, 1949
StatusPublished

This text of 40 So. 2d 890 (Purpura Bros. v. Oxner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Purpura Bros. v. Oxner, 40 So. 2d 890, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 1431 (Fla. 1949).

Opinions

Action by R.W. Oxner against Purpura Brothers, Inc., for failure of defendant to perform a written contract to purchase a crop. From the judgment, defendant appeals.

Affirmed. The testimony has been read and carefully considered, the briefs of counsel have been examined, and, after hearing oral argument at the bar of this Court, it cannot be said that reversible error has been made to appear.

Affirmed.

ADAMS, C.J., and TERRELL, CHAPMAN, THOMAS, and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

WHITE, Associate Justice, dissents.

BARNS, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pensacola Electric Terminal Railway Co. v. Haussman
51 Fla. 286 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1906)
Jacksonville Electric Co. v. Batchis
54 Fla. 192 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1907)
Lewter v. Tomlinson
54 Fla. 215 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1907)
Collins v. Godwin
61 So. 632 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 So. 2d 890, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 1431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/purpura-bros-v-oxner-fla-1949.