Puro v. Puro

351 N.E.2d 428, 39 N.Y.2d 808, 385 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2754
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 4, 1976
StatusPublished

This text of 351 N.E.2d 428 (Puro v. Puro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Puro v. Puro, 351 N.E.2d 428, 39 N.Y.2d 808, 385 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2754 (N.Y. 1976).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal granted. Prosecution on the appeal should be deferred until such time as all remaining issues on the complaint and any cross claims are resolved and available for joint calendaring of appeals, if any.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
351 N.E.2d 428, 39 N.Y.2d 808, 385 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/puro-v-puro-ny-1976.