Purnell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Purnell v. State

1924 OK CR 254, 229 P. 1118, 28 Okla. Crim. 165, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 258

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 25, 1924

DocketNo. A-4535.

StatusPublished

This text of 1924 OK CR 254 (Purnell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Purnell v. State, 1924 OK CR 254, 229 P. 1118, 28 Okla. Crim. 165, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 258 (Okla. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by plaintiff in error from a judgment of conviction rendered in the county court of Comanche county on the 25th day of November, 1922, on a verdict finding the defendant guilty of manufacturing whisky and assessing his punishment -at imprisonment for 30 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $50. The petition in error with case-made attached was filed in this court on January 2, 1923. The cause was finally submitted on October 6, 1924. No brief has been filed in behalf of plaintiff in error, and no appearance was made to orally argue the cause at the time it was submitted. Rule 9 of this court provides: “When no counsel appears, and no briefs are filed, the court will examine the' pleadings, the instructions of the court and. the exceptions taken thereto, and the judgment and sentence, and if no prejudicial error appears, will affirm the judgment. ’ ’ After an , examination of the *166 pleadings, the instructions of the court, and the judgment and sentence, the court finds that no prejudicial error occurred sufficient to authorize a reversal of this judgment, and the same is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by plaintiff in error from a judgment of conviction rendered in the county court of Comanche county on the 25th day of November, 1922, on a verdict finding the defendant guilty of manufacturing whisky and assessing his punishment -at imprisonment for 30 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $50. The petition in error with case-made attached was filed in this court on January 2, 1923. The cause was finally submitted on October 6, 1924. No brief has been filed in behalf of plaintiff in error, and no appearance was made to orally argue the cause at the time it was submitted. Rule 9 of this court provides: “When no counsel appears, and no briefs are filed, the court will examine the' pleadings, the instructions of the court and. the exceptions taken thereto, and the judgment and sentence, and if no prejudicial error appears, will affirm the judgment. ’ ’ After an , examination of the *166 pleadings, the instructions of the court, and the judgment and sentence, the court finds that no prejudicial error occurred sufficient to authorize a reversal of this judgment, and the same is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1924 OK CR 254, 229 P. 1118, 28 Okla. Crim. 165, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/purnell-v-state-oklacrimapp-1924.