Purnell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Purnell v. State

513 S.W.3d 385, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 160, 2017 WL 976031

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 14, 2017

DocketNo. ED 104447

StatusPublished

This text of 513 S.W.3d 385 (Purnell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Purnell v. State, 513 S.W.3d 385, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 160, 2017 WL 976031 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kelvin E. Purnell appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kelvin E. Purnell appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

513 S.W.3d 385, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 160, 2017 WL 976031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/purnell-v-state-moctapp-2017.