Purnell v. PURNELL III

907 A.2d 91, 280 Conn. 903
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 13, 2006
StatusPublished

This text of 907 A.2d 91 (Purnell v. PURNELL III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Purnell v. PURNELL III, 907 A.2d 91, 280 Conn. 903 (Colo. 2006).

Opinion

907 A.2d 91 (2006)
280 Conn. 903

Cheryl PURNELL
v.
O. James PURNELL III.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided September 13, 2006.

Campbell D. Barrett, in support of the petition.

Deborah W.A. Eliason, Enfield, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 95 Conn.App. 677, 897 A.2d 717 (2006), is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Purnell v. Purnell
897 A.2d 717 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
907 A.2d 91, 280 Conn. 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/purnell-v-purnell-iii-conn-2006.