Puritan Oil & Paint Co. v. Yates

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Puritan Oil & Paint Co. v. Yates

117 S.E. 122, 30 Ga. App. 105, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 278

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 10, 1923

Docket14169

StatusPublished

This text of 117 S.E. 122 (Puritan Oil & Paint Co. v. Yates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Puritan Oil & Paint Co. v. Yates, 117 S.E. 122, 30 Ga. App. 105, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 278 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

There was some evidence to authorize the verdict, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. The exceptions to the charge of the court are without merit. The charge of the court was full and fair and submitted correctly the issues of the case as made by the pleadings and evidence. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodic-orth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

There was some evidence to authorize the verdict, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. The exceptions to the charge of the court are without merit. The charge of the court was full and fair and submitted correctly the issues of the case as made by the pleadings and evidence. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodic-orth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 S.E. 122, 30 Ga. App. 105, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/puritan-oil-paint-co-v-yates-gactapp-1923.