Purifoy v. State

688 So. 2d 960, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1360, 1997 WL 68006
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 20, 1997·No. No. 96-1155·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his nolo contendere plea [961]*961is not reviewable in the present appeal from the order granting probation. When a defendant seeks to withdraw a plea after the sentence has been imposed, or in this case after probation has been ordered, the correct procedure is to file a sworn motion under rule 3.850. Brown v. State, 661 So.2d 95 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). We find no error as to any other issue concerning the probation order that is the subject of the appeal.

Affirmed.

WEBSTER, LAWRENCE and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Purifoy v. State, 688 So. 2d 960, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1360, 1997 WL 68006 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

688 So. 2d 960 (Purifoy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
661 So. 2d 95 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)