Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Purifoy v. State

Purifoy v. State

688 So. 2d 960, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1360, 1997 WL 68006
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 20, 1997
DocketNo. 96-1155
StatusPublished

This text of 688 So. 2d 960 (Purifoy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Purifoy v. State, 688 So. 2d 960, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1360, 1997 WL 68006 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his nolo contendere plea [961]*961is not reviewable in the present appeal from the order granting probation. When a defendant seeks to withdraw a plea after the sentence has been imposed, or in this case after probation has been ordered, the correct procedure is to file a sworn motion under rule 3.850. Brown v. State, 661 So.2d 95 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). We find no error as to any other issue concerning the probation order that is the subject of the appeal.

Affirmed.

WEBSTER, LAWRENCE and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. State
661 So. 2d 95 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
688 So. 2d 960, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1360, 1997 WL 68006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/purifoy-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.