Purdy v. Winters' Estate

159 P. 1091, 85 Or. 188, 1916 Ore. LEXIS 222
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided October 27, 1916·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moore.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal. A judgment in a former action between these parties, rendered in favor of the defendants, was affirmed on appeal: Purdy v. Wmters’ Estate, 79 Or. 614 (156 Pac. 285). When the mandate went down the plaintiff commenced another action wherein the complaint set forth substantially the charges made in the former action. A demurrer to the complaint herein was sustained and the action dismissed without prejudice, from which latter judgment the plaintiff again appeals. Believing that the questions here involved have been fully litigated and finally determined by this court, the appeal should be dismissed and it is so ordered. Dismissed.

Former opinion sustained on rehearing July 17, 1917.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Purdy v. Winters' Estate, 159 P. 1091, 85 Or. 188, 1916 Ore. LEXIS 222 (Or. 1916).

159 P. 1091 (Purdy v. Winters' Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CREDIT BUREAU, INC. OF GEORGIA v. Marshall
630 P.2d 910 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1981)
State Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Bates
362 P.2d 321 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1961)
Columbia Auto Works, Inc. v. Yates
156 P.2d 561 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1945)
Benson v. Birch
10 P.2d 1050 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1932)
Purdy v. Winters' Estate
159 P. 1091 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1916)