Purdy v. Winters' Estate
Opinions
Opinion by
This is a motion to dismiss an appeal. A judgment in a former action between these parties, rendered in favor of the defendants, was affirmed on appeal: Purdy v. Wmters’ Estate, 79 Or. 614 (156 Pac. 285). When the mandate went down the plaintiff commenced another action wherein the complaint set forth substantially the charges made in the former action. A demurrer to the complaint herein was sustained and the action dismissed without prejudice, from which latter judgment the plaintiff again appeals. Believing that the questions here involved have been fully litigated and finally determined by this court, the appeal should be dismissed and it is so ordered. Dismissed.
Former opinion sustained on rehearing July 17, 1917.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
159 P. 1091 (Purdy v. Winters' Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.