Purdy v. Wardell & M'Coun
This text of 10 Wend. 619 (Purdy v. Wardell & M'Coun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
At a term previous to the present the defendants asked to change the venue in this cause, on the ground of having seven witnesses in the county to which they wished to change the venue. The plaintiff swore that he had a greater number of witnesses residing in the county where the venue was laid, and the motion was of course denied. The defendants now renewed their motion, stating that they had fifteen witnesses in the county to which they wished to change the venue. The motion was denied, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Wend. 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/purdy-v-wardell-mcoun-nysupct-1834.