Purdy v. Tailer

15 Misc. 467, 71 N.Y. St. Rep. 871
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1896
StatusPublished

This text of 15 Misc. 467 (Purdy v. Tailer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Purdy v. Tailer, 15 Misc. 467, 71 N.Y. St. Rep. 871 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1896).

Opinion

McCarthy, J.

In regard to the' formal proof on the admission of the photographs offered in evidence we think no harm was done, since the plaintiff afterwards practically admitted that these photographs were correct and represented only one portion of the building.

[468]*468This was as claimed for by the defendant, and if there was any defect at the time they were offered and admitted in evidence, that was cured by the admission.

The case was fairly and fully presented by both sides on the facts, and the charge of the trial justice was clear and concise, to which no objection was taken.

We find no substantial errors, and, therefore, judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Eotty, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Misc. 467, 71 N.Y. St. Rep. 871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/purdy-v-tailer-nynyccityct-1896.