Purdy v. Martin
31 Mich. 455, 1875 Mich. LEXIS 98
Opinion
The record in this case is fatally defective in not showing service of notice on the several persons entitled thereto. In People v. Highway Commissioners of Nankin, 14 Mich., 528, it was decided that a mere general allegation that notice was duly served on the persons entitled, without naming the persons, was only an assertion of a conclusion of law, and wholly insufficient. We have always since followed this decision, and have seen no reason to doubt its correctness.
Proceedings reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Purdy v. Martin, 31 Mich. 455, 1875 Mich. LEXIS 98 (Mich. 1875).
31 Mich. 455 (Purdy v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
La Barre v. Bent
118 N.W. 6 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1908)
In re Rector of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre
61 How. Pr. 315 (New York Supreme Court, 1880)
People ex rel. Tireman v. Ruthruff
40 Mich. 175 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1879)