Purdy v. Evans
This text of 231 So. 2d 836 (Purdy v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court, in a habeas corpus proceeding, held paragraphs 30.15(a) and 30.15 (b),1 Code of Metropolitan Dade County, void because of its failure to incorporate the provisions for a jury trial contained in Section 322.262(4), Florida Statutes, F.S.A. The direct appeal here by the Sheriff of Dade County is accepted under authority of Boyd v. County of Dade, 123 So.2d 323 (Fla.1960).
This case is governed by the decision of this Court rendered this day in the case of Smith v. Davis, 231 So.2d 517 (Fla.)
We are not persuaded by the argument of appellee that because this case arose under the Code of Metropolitan Dade County it is governed by different principles from those involved in the Vero Beach case.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
231 So. 2d 836, 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/purdy-v-evans-fla-1970.