Purdy v. Brown

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Purdy v. Brown

4 Ark. 535

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJuly 15, 1842

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 4 Ark. 535 (Purdy v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Purdy v. Brown, 4 Ark. 535 (Ark. 1842).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court,

Dickinson, J.

The principle has already been decided by this court, in the case of Block vs. Walker, 2 Ark. 4, that, when an assignor assigns a note, all the legal interest vests in the as-signee, end that he alone is entitled to sue, unless the assignor s againi invested with the legal interest by a new assignment or otherwise. As long as the assignment remains upon the note, no proof is competent to show legal interest in another, because under our statute, it is vested in the assignee.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

Dickinson, J.

The principle has already been decided by this court, in the case of Block vs. Walker, 2 Ark. 4, that, when an assignor assigns a note, all the legal interest vests in the as-signee, end that he alone is entitled to sue, unless the assignor s againi invested with the legal interest by a new assignment or otherwise. As long as the assignment remains upon the note, no proof is competent to show legal interest in another, because under our statute, it is vested in the assignee.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Ark. 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/purdy-v-brown-ark-1842.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack