Purdy v. . Brantingham
76 N.E. 1106, 184 N.Y. 533, 1906 N.Y. LEXIS 1421
This text of 76 N.E. 1106 (Purdy v. . Brantingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Purdy v. . Brantingham, 76 N.E. 1106, 184 N.Y. 533, 1906 N.Y. LEXIS 1421 (N.Y. 1906).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Werner, His-cock and Chase, JJ. Not voting: Edward T. Bartlett, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
76 N.E. 1106, 184 N.Y. 533, 1906 N.Y. LEXIS 1421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/purdy-v-brantingham-ny-1906.