Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Iancu
This text of Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Iancu (Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Iancu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
PURDUE PHARMA L.P., P.F. LABORATORIES, INC., PURDUE PHARMACEUTICALS L.P., Appellants
v.
ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________
2018-1285, 2018-1286 ______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2016- 01027, IPR2016-01028. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JENNIFER LORAINE SWIZE, Jones Day, Washington, DC, argued for appellants. Also represented by ROBERT STANDER, GREGORY A. CASTANIAS; GASPER LAROSA, JOHN JOSEPH NORMILE, JR., New York, NY.
SARAH E. CRAVEN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MARY L. KELLY, JOSEPH MATAL. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, MAYER, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
April 4, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Iancu, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/purdue-pharma-lp-v-iancu-cafc-2019.