Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Iancu
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
PURDUE PHARMA L.P., P.F. LABORATORIES, INC., PURDUE PHARMACEUTICALS L.P., Appellants
v.
ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor
2018-1285, 2018-1286
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2016- 01027, IPR2016-01028.
JUDGMENT
JENNIFER LORAINE SWIZE, Jones Day, Washington, DC, argued for appellants. Also represented by ROBERT STANDER, GREGORY A. CASTANIAS; GASPER LAROSA, JOHN JOSEPH NORMILE, JR., New York, NY.
SARAH E. CRAVEN, Office of the Solicitor, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MARY L. KELLY, JOSEPH MATAL.
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, MAYER, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
April 4, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Iancu (Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Iancu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.