Purdue 113333 v. Arizona Department of Corrections

District Court, D. Arizona·Decided November 14, 2024·No. 2:24-cv-01121·Unknown

Opinion

1 MH 2 WO 3 4 5 8 9 Jacob J. Purdue, No. CV-24-01121-PHX-JAT (DMF) 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER 12 Arizona Department of Corrections, et 13 al., 14 Defendants.

15 16 On May 14, 2024, Plaintiff Jacob J. Purdue, who was then confined in the Arizona 17 State Prison Complex (ASPC)-Lewis,1 filed a pro se Complaint and an Application to 18 Proceed In Forma Pauperis. In a June 3, 2024 Order, the Court denied the Application to 19 Proceed as deficient and gave Plaintiff 30 days to either pay the required fees or file a 20 complete in forma pauperis application. On July 8, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Motion entitled 21 “Response to States Motion Requesting Info & Requesting Time” (Doc. 6) and a second 22 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 7). On September 9, 2024, Plaintiff filed 23 a Motion for Investigation (Doc. 8). 24 The Court will deny the Motions and Application to Proceed and will give Plaintiff 25 30 days to either pay the filing and administrative fees or file a new complete Application 26 to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. 27

28 1 On September 16, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Change of Address indicating that he has been transferred to ASPC-Eyman. 1 I. Payment of Filing Fee 2 When bringing an action, a prisoner must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and a 3 $55.00 administrative fee in a lump sum or, if granted the privilege of proceeding in forma 4 pauperis, pay the $350.00 filing fee incrementally as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). 5 An application to proceed in forma pauperis requires an affidavit of indigence and a 6 certified copy of the inmate’s trust account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the 7 six months preceding the filing of the Complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). An inmate must 8 submit statements from each institution where he was confined during the six-month 9 period. Id. To assist prisoners in meeting these requirements, the Court requires use of a 10 form application. LRCiv 3.4. 11 If a prisoner is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court will assess an 12 initial partial filing fee of 20% of either the average monthly deposits or the average 13 monthly balance in Plaintiff’s account, whichever is greater. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). An 14 initial partial filing fee will only be collected when funds exist. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4). 15 The balance of the $350.00 filing fee will be collected in monthly payments of 20% of the 16 preceding month’s income credited to an inmate’s account, each time the amount in the 17 account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). 18 II. Application Fails to Comply With Statute 19 Plaintiff has used the court-approved form, but he has failed to submit a certified 20 six-month trust account statement, as required. And while Plaintiff’s Motions indicate that 21 he has had difficulty obtaining a certified six-month trust account statement, it is not clear 22 whether he followed the procedures set forth in DO 905.10, which sets forth the process 23 for obtaining a “certified statement of account.”2 The Court has rarely encountered

24 2 Specifically, DO 905.10 states: 25 10.1 To request a certified statement of account, inmates shall send an 26 Inmate Letter, to their Business Office where they are housed. The Business Office designee shall scan and email the Inmate Letter to the Central Office 27 ITA staff. 28 10.2 Within five workdays of receiving the Inmate Letter, Central Office ITA staff shall process the request and generate an email with the signed 1 problems with official certification when it has been requested in accordance with DO 2 905.10, and Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed will therefore be denied without prejudice. 3 If Plaintiff submits another request to ADC officials for a copy of his certified 4 trust account statement, he should comply with the instructions in DO 905.10 and 5 attach a copy of this Order to his request. If Plaintiff finds that he is still unable to 6 complete the Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, he must file a declaration signed 7 under penalty of perjury setting forth facts to support that he is unable to comply as the 8 result of acts or omissions that are beyond his control. This declaration must identify when 9 and from whom Plaintiff requested a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement 10 and certification as to the status of his trust account, and the response(s) he received, if any, 11 to his request(s). 12 III. Response to States Motion Requesting Info & Requesting Time 13 In his “Response to States Motion Requesting Info & Requesting Time,” Plaintiff 14 appears to request an extension of time to file an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 15 application. The Court will grant the Motion insofar as Plaintiff will have 30 days from 16 the filing date of this Order to either pay the filing and administrative fees or file a complete 17 in forma pauperis application. 18 IV. Motion for Investigation 19 In his Motion for Investigation, Plaintiff states that the law-library access at ASPC-

20 certified statement, and a memo of instructions to the corresponding Business Office. 21 10.3 The Business Office staff shall process and document the request in 22 accordance with the Unit Certified Statement Procedure. The signed Inmate Letter is authorization to charge the inmate for the Certified Statement. 23 10.3.1 Inmates shall incur a charge $0.25 per page. A notice shall be sent to 24 the Business Manager to collect the fee. If funds are not available, the inmate’s Spendable Account shall be placed on hold for the amount. 25 10.4 The inmate shall present the completed form “Application to Proceed 26 in Forma Pauperis” and the certified statements to their assigned Correctional Officer III for certification. The certified application shall be returned to the 27 inmate who is responsible for filing a petition with the court. The application shall not be certified by the unit’s Business Office. 28 1 Eyman is insufficient and expresses concern that his July 8, 2024 filings did not reach the 2 Court. He asks the Court to “look into” the lack of law library access at ASPC-Lewis. The 3 Court construes Plaintiff’s Motion as a Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order or 4 Preliminary Injunction. 5 To obtain a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, the moving party 6 must show “that he is likely to succeed on the merits, that he is likely to suffer irreparable 7 harm in the absence of preliminary relief, that the balance of equities tips in his favor, and 8 that an injunction is in the public interest.” Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 9 U.S. 7, 20 (2008). The moving party has the burden of proof on each element of the test. 10 Envtl. Council of Sacramento v. Slater, 184 F. Supp. 2d 1016, 1027 (E.D. Cal. 2000). 11 Plaintiff has neither addressed the elements of the Winter test nor shown that he is likely 12 to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of the requested relief. The Motion for 13 Investigation will therefore be denied. 14 V. Warnings 15 A. Address Changes 16 Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule 17 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other 18 relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this 19 action. 20 B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Purdue 113333 v. Arizona Department of Corrections, (D. Ariz. 2024).

Purdue 113333 v. Arizona Department of Corrections (Purdue 113333 v. Arizona Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, Sheriff
963 F.2d 1258 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
Environmental Council of Sacramento v. Slater
184 F. Supp. 2d 1016 (E.D. California, 2000)