Purcella v. United States

968 F.2d 10, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 15747
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedJuly 10, 1992
DocketNos. 92-1071, 92-1078 and 92-1107
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 968 F.2d 10 (Purcella v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Purcella v. United States, 968 F.2d 10, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 15747 (10th Cir. 1992).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Rule 42(b), Fed.R.App.P., and the stipulation submitted by the parties, these appeals have been settled and are hereby dismissed as moot. The case is remanded to the district court with instructions to vacate its judgment of January 14, 1992, reported at 1992 WL 8723, 1992 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 426, and to dismiss the complaint. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39-40, 71 S.Ct. 104, 106-107, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950); Beattie v. United States, 949 F.2d 1092, 1095 (10th Cir.1991); Tosco Corp. v. Hodel, 826 F.2d 948 (10th Cir.1987).

Each party shall bear its own costs and the mandate shall issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
968 F.2d 10, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 15747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/purcella-v-united-states-ca10-1992.