Purcell v. Riebe

76 A. 212, 227 Pa. 503, 1910 Pa. LEXIS 694
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 16, 1910·No. Appeal, No. 364·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

March 21, 1910:

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned judge before whom the case was tried.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Purcell v. Riebe, 76 A. 212, 227 Pa. 503, 1910 Pa. LEXIS 694 (Pa. 1910).

76 A. 212 (Purcell v. Riebe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pischke Et Vir. v. Dormont Boro.
33 A.2d 480 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Davis v. Potter
17 A.2d 338 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1940)
German v. McKeesport City (Et Al.)
8 A.2d 437 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
Starovetsky v. Pennsylvania Railroad
195 A. 871 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Kuntz v. Pittsburgh
187 A. 287 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Kaczynski v. Pittsburgh
163 A. 513 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)
Levitt v. B/G Sandwich Shops, Inc.
144 A. 71 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)
Newell v. Pittsburgh
123 A. 768 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Davis v. Shenandoah Borough
117 A. 207 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)
Smith v. Shamokin Borough
110 A. 640 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)
Goodwyn v. City of Shreveport
64 So. 762 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1914)
McManamon v. Hanover Township
81 A. 440 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)