Purcell v. Purcell

3 Edw. Ch. 194, 1838 N.Y. LEXIS 264, 1838 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 5
New York Court of Chancery·Decided March 13, 1838·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

The Vice-Chancellor observed :

If a husband will come into this court, complaining of his wife, either for a divorce or a separation, and the wife chooses to make a defence denying, under oath, the grounds of the bill, he must expect to furnish her with money to enable her to make her defence, and with suitable support during the litigation ; and it is no excuse for the husband that his condition and circumstances will not allow of his making such provision. He must either make it or abandon the suit.

Mr. Samuel H. Platt, for the petitioner, the wife.

Mr. Judah, for the complainant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Purcell v. Purcell, 3 Edw. Ch. 194, 1838 N.Y. LEXIS 264, 1838 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 5 (N.Y. 1838).

3 Edw. Ch. 194 (Purcell v. Purcell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wallman v. Wallman
229 P. 1 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1924)
Nottingham v. Nottingham
209 A.D. 459 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)
Brown v. Brown
83 Misc. 597 (New York Supreme Court, 1914)
Cohen v. Cohen
32 N.Y.S. 1082 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1895)
Wood v. Mitchell
61 How. Pr. 48 (New York Supreme Court, 1881)
Mangels v. Mangels
6 Mo. App. 481 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1879)
Ford v. Ford
10 Abb. Pr. 74 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1871)
Thayer v. Thayer
9 R.I. 377 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1869)
Hallock v. Hallock
4 How. Pr. 160 (New York Supreme Court, 1849)