Purcell v. Arizona

137 S. Ct. 369, 196 L. Ed. 2d 287, 85 U.S.L.W. 3208, 2016 WL 1381819, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 6537
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 31, 2016·No. No. 15–8842.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One for further consideration in light of Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 718, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016).

Justice SOTOMAYOR concurs in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand. See Tatum v. Arizona, 580 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 11, --- L.E.2d ---- (2016) ( Sotomayor, J., concurring). Justice ALITO, with whom Justice THOMAS joins, dissents from the decision to grant, vacate, and remand. See Tatum v. Arizona, 580 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 11, --- L.E.2d ---- (2016) (Alito, J., dissenting).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Purcell v. Arizona, 137 S. Ct. 369, 196 L. Ed. 2d 287, 85 U.S.L.W. 3208, 2016 WL 1381819, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 6537 (U.S. 2016).

137 S. Ct. 369 (Purcell v. Arizona) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Malvo v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2022
Cunio v. Brown
D. Oregon, 2020