Pupols v. United States Patent & Trademark Office

Federal Circuit

Pupols v. United States Patent & Trademark Office

394 F. App'x 712

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pupols v. United States Patent & Trademark Office. Read the opinion of the Court — 413 F. App'x 232 →

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided September 10, 2010·No. 2010-1245·Unpublished

Opinion

ON MOTION

ORDER

Juris Zanis Pupols moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of an attorney.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

(2) The motion for appointment of pro bono counsel is denied.

(3) The United States Patent and Trademark Office should calculate the due *713 date for its brief from the date of filing of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION

ORDER

Juris Zanis Pupols moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of an attorney.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

(2) The motion for appointment of pro bono counsel is denied.

(3) The United States Patent and Trademark Office should calculate the due *713 date for its brief from the date of filing of this order.

Pupols v. United States Patent & Trademark Office, 394 F. App'x 712 (Fed. Cir. 2010).

Pincite

394 F. App'x 712 (Pupols v. United States Patent & Trademark Office) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.