Puntervold v. Allstate Insurance

Supreme Court of Florida

Puntervold v. Allstate Insurance

184 So. 2d 176, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3777

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMarch 16, 1966

DocketNo. 35000

StatusPublished

This text of 184 So. 2d 176 (Puntervold v. Allstate Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Puntervold v. Allstate Insurance, 184 So. 2d 176, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3777 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 16, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.Á.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that [177]*177there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees also is denied.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI