Punderson v. Town of Chittenden
372 A.2d 1388, 135 Vt. 629, 1977 Vt. LEXIS 706
Opinion
The provisions of V.R.A.P. 10(b) requiring that motions with respect to abbreviated transcripts be heard by the presiding judge of the Superior Court in cases there filed, the motion under V.R.A.P. 10(b) filed here in the above-captioned case is remanded for prompt disposition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Punderson v. Town of Chittenden, 372 A.2d 1388, 135 Vt. 629, 1977 Vt. LEXIS 706 (Vt. 1977).
372 A.2d 1388 (Punderson v. Town of Chittenden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Love v. City of Philadelphia
543 A.2d 531 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1988)