Punderson v. Town of Chittenden
372 A.2d 1388, 135 Vt. 629, 1977 Vt. LEXIS 706
This text of 372 A.2d 1388 (Punderson v. Town of Chittenden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Punderson v. Town of Chittenden, 372 A.2d 1388, 135 Vt. 629, 1977 Vt. LEXIS 706 (Vt. 1977).
Opinion
The provisions of V.R.A.P. 10(b) requiring that motions with respect to abbreviated transcripts be heard by the presiding judge of the Superior Court in cases there filed, the motion under V.R.A.P. 10(b) filed here in the above-captioned case is remanded for prompt disposition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Love v. City of Philadelphia
543 A.2d 531 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1988)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
372 A.2d 1388, 135 Vt. 629, 1977 Vt. LEXIS 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/punderson-v-town-of-chittenden-vt-1977.