Pumpelley v. Village of Owego
This text of 13 Abb. Pr. 387 (Pumpelley v. Village of Owego) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—The appeal is expressly authorized by subd. 2 of section 349 of the Code. (See Valton a. The National Loan Fund Insurance Co., 19 How. Pr., 515.) That section provides that an appeal may be taken to the general term, “ where it grants or refuses a new trial.” It is not denied that plaintiffs could have reviewed the order refusing a new trial, by appealing from the judgment that was subsequently entered (see Code, § 329) ; but they could appeal from the order and not from the judgment, if they saw fit so to do, notwith standing the entry of judgment.
Motion denied, with $10 costs, to abide event.
Present, Mason, P. J., Campbell, and Balcom, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 Abb. Pr. 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pumpelley-v-village-of-owego-nysupct-1862.