Pumilia v. Pumilia

184 Misc. 1018, 55 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1888
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 18, 1945·Published

Opinion

Hallinan, J.

Motion to examine Kings County Hospital before' trial, as a witness in this divorce action, denied. Aside from the fact that I do not deem the limited examination here sought necessary, in view of the defendant’s attitude as evidenced by her waiver ” sworn to May 7, 1945, the institution sought to be examined by its superintendent is owned by a municipal corporation and operated by its Commissioner of Hospitals. I do not see how such a hospital can be examined before trial as a witness.

Formerly there was no authority to examine before trial either as a party or otherwise, any municipal corporation, its agencies, departments or employees. By section 292-a of the Civil Practice Act, as amended, authority to permit such an examination was granted “ Where a public corporation is a party to an action, or an original owner of a claim * * (Italics supplied.) (See Hammel Station Estates v. City of New York, 184 Misc. 859.)

Here the City of New York, which owns the Kings County Hospital, is neither a party to this action nor the original owner of a claim. Hence there is no statutory authority for the examination. Settle order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pumilia v. Pumilia, 184 Misc. 1018, 55 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1888 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1945).

184 Misc. 1018 (Pumilia v. Pumilia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hammel Station Estates, Inc. v. City of New York
184 Misc. 859 (New York Supreme Court, 1945)