Pumarejo-Garcia v. McDonough

242 A.D.2d 374, 662 N.Y.S.2d 66, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8468
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 25, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 242 A.D.2d 374 (Pumarejo-Garcia v. McDonough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pumarejo-Garcia v. McDonough, 242 A.D.2d 374, 662 N.Y.S.2d 66, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8468 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Golden, J.), dated August 30, 1996, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 3215 for leave to enter a default judgment based upon the defendant’s failure to serve an answer, and compelled them to accept the answer.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the plaintiffs’ motion is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings.

In order to successfully oppose a motion for leave to enter a

[375]*375default judgment based upon the defendant’s failure to serve an answer, the defendant must demonstrate reasonable excuse for the delay and provide a meritorious defense (see, Dinerstein & Lesser v Ambulette Assn., 88 AD2d 945). The defendant has failed to satisfy this standard.

Vehicle and Traffic Law § 505 (5) requires that every motor vehicle licensee notify the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles of any change of residence within 10 days of the change. A party who fails to comply with this provision will be estopped from challenging the propriety of service which is made to the former address (see, Sherrill v Pettiford, 172 AD2d 512). In this case, the defendant acknowledged that he moved from his prior address in Richmond Hill in November 1993 and thus admittedly failed to comply with this statutory mandate. The defendant is therefore estopped from raising a claim of defective service because he concealed his new address (see, Feinstein v Bergner, 48 NY2d 234, 241; Sherrill v Pettiford, supra; Kramer v Ryder Truck Rental, 112 AD2d 194).

In any event, the defense proffered by the defendant, that the plaintiffs’ car stopped short, is not a meritorious one under these circumstances (see, Leal v Wolff, 224 AD2d 392). Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Santucci, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. Reyes
59 A.D.3d 436 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Candela v. Johnson
48 A.D.3d 502 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Kalamadeen v. Singh
19 Misc. 3d 23 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Velasquez v. Gallelli
44 A.D.3d 934 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Kandov v. Gondal
11 A.D.3d 516 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Ortiz v. Santiago
303 A.D.2d 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
General Accident Insurance v. Fuat
192 Misc. 2d 497 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2002)
Singh v. Friedson
288 A.D.2d 292 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Mootoo v. Ruiz
286 A.D.2d 321 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Dye v. Columbia
280 A.D.2d 513 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Traore v. Nelson
277 A.D.2d 443 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Angus v. Stephens
276 A.D.2d 572 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
McCleaver v. VanFossen
276 A.D.2d 603 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Fanarof v. Rentar Development Corp.
276 A.D.2d 465 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Feiger v. Milgrom
270 A.D.2d 452 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Warren v. James
267 A.D.2d 379 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Bernstein v. McGuinness
267 A.D.2d 340 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Keane v. Kamin
723 N.E.2d 553 (New York Court of Appeals, 1999)
Santiago v. Siega
255 A.D.2d 306 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
New York State Electric & Gas Corp v. Allen
246 A.D.2d 855 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 A.D.2d 374, 662 N.Y.S.2d 66, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pumarejo-garcia-v-mcdonough-nyappdiv-1997.