Pulver v. Kane

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided August 13, 2021·No. 3:20-cv-00673·Unknown

Opinion

! || Christian L. Moore, Esq. Dane A. Littlefield, Esq. 2 Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg 3 6005 Plumas Street, Third Floor Reno, NV 89519 4 |} Telephone: (775) 786-6868 clm@lge.net; dal@lge.net Theodore E. Chrissinger, Esq. 6 || Hoy Chrissinger Vallas 3 50 W. Liberty St., Suite 840 - Reno, Nevada 89501 g || Lelephone: (775) 786-8000 tchrissinger@nevadalaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff 10 || GARY A. PULVER dba PULVER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 ||] GARY A. PULVER dba PULVER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, an ||| individual, Case. No.: 3:20-cv-00673-MMD-CLB 16 Honorable Miranda M. Du Plaintiff, 17 v. 18 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER BARRY KANE, an individual; ANNA 19 ||| KANE, an individual; and 1059 LAKESHORE BOULEVARD LLC, a 20 ||| Nevada limited liability company fka 1059 Lakeshore Drive LLC, Defendants. 93 ||| 1059 LAKESHORE BOULEVARD LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, 24 Counterclaimant, 25 v. 26 GARY A. PULVER dba PULVER 27 ||| CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, an 28 individual, GRUNDY & EISENBERG

and ROES 1-50, inclusive,

3 ||| GARY A. PULVER dba PULVER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, an 4 ||| individual, 5 ||| Third-Party Plaintiff, 6 Ill vy. 7 Ill CRUZ CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, g INC., a Nevada corporation, 9 ||| Third-Party Defendant. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER, CONFIDENTIALITY 11 AND NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT 12 COMES NOW, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff GARY A. PULVER 13 || doa PULVER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, by and through its counsel LEMONS, GRUNDY & 14 || EISENBERG, Defendant/Counterclaimant 1059 LAKESHORE BOULEVARD, LLC and 15 || Defendants BARRY KANE and ANNA KANE, by and through their counsel of record 16 || MOUNTAINSIDE Law, and Third-Party Defendant CRUZ CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., 17 through its counsel, ERICKSON, THORPE & SWAINSTON, and hereby certify that they have 1g ||conferred amongst each other pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1) and hereby stipulate to the 19 || following joint Stipulated Protective Order, Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure Agreement, 99 || Subject to the approval of the Court. 1 1. Purpose. It is recognized that certain information that may be produced and 97 || discussed in this litigation is deserving of protection under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) in that it may 53, || contain confidential, personal, or commercial information which is sensitive and private in nature 54 || and therefore deserving of protection from disclosure and dissemination. This protective order 95 || is intended to govern the use and dissemination of this confidential information which may be 56 contained in all documents and other discovery material, specifically including electronically »7 || Stored information (ESI) produced by the parties, whether informally or formally, and whether 5g || produced affirmatively by a party pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 or in response to interrogatories,

1 || request for admissions, request for production of documents, or obtained or submitted to the court 2 || through affidavit, designated record or other testimony, whether through deposition or otherwise, 3 || obtained or submitted in this action. 4 A “Producing Party” or “Producing Parties” as used herein means any party and any non- 5 || party that has produced documents pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including 6 || by subpoena or similar process. 7 2. Definition of Confidential Information. Confidential information shall be 8 || designated as such at the time of production or as soon as practicable and should be limited to 9 || any information which a party reasonably and in good faith believes to contain or disclose 10 || confidential, sensitive and private, trade secrets or other confidential research, development, 11 || commercial or financial proprietary personal or business information of the party or of a third 12 party, that could not be independently obtained, and/or confidential, personal or business 13 information, the disclosure of which might reasonably pose a commercial disadvantage to the 14 |] owner or custodian of the information. 15 3. Limitation on Designation of Information. The parties shall only designate 16 ||information that is confidential if they have a reasonable and good faith belief that the 17 || information should, in fact, be so designated. If the Court later determines that the parties did 18 || not act reasonably or in good faith in making such a designation, the Court shall award to the 19 || party opposing the designation that party’s reasonable attorneys’ fees in disputing the 20 || designation; provided, however, that no party may challenge such a designation unless and until 21 || that party has first made a reasonable good faith attempt to resolve the matter informally with the 22 || designating party. If any party objects to the designation of “CONFIDENTIAL”, such party shall 23 || state the objection in a letter to counsel for the producing party, setting forth the reasons that the 24 || party believes the material should not be treated as confidential information. The producing party 25 || shall respond, in writing, within ten days of receipt of the objection, setting forth the reasons the 26 || producing party believes the material is confidential. Ifthe parties cannot resolve the objection, 27 || the objecting party may then move the Court for an appropriate order regarding such designation. 28

1 || Until such objection is resolved, the information shall be treated as confidential information and 2 ||remain subject to the Protective Order. 3 4, Method of Document Designation. Documents containing confidential 4 || information may be so designated at the point of production or as soon thereafter as is practical. 5 || Confidential information shall be identified by the designating producing party, on the first or 6 ||cover page of each document and each page thereafter which contains the confidential 7 || information by the label, “CONFIDENTIAL.” 8 5. Designation of Deposition Testimony. Deposition testimony that the parties 9 || reasonably believe will contain confidential information shall! only be taken in the presence of 10 || the persons entitled to such information under this Order. Where practical, the record shall 11 || identify those portions which relate to confidential information and that information will be 12 || identified as such at the time the deposition is taken. At the request of the party claiming 13 || confidentiality, the parties may make arrangements with the court reporter so that the portion of 14 || the transcription in question can be separately bound and labeled as confidential. 15 6. Method of Exhibit Designation. Exhibits introduced at deposition or trial that 16 || contain confidential information may be so designated by making a statement to that effect on 17 record at the time of their introduction. At the request of the party claiming confidentiality, 18 |] exhibits designated as containing confidential information shall be placed in sealed containers or 19 || otherwise designated as such prior to being place in the Court file so as to ensure that they are 20 || not placed within the public record. 21 7. Qualified Persons to Review Confidential Information.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pulver v. Kane, (D. Nev. 2021).

Pulver v. Kane (Pulver v. Kane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)