Pulver v. Kane

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided August 13, 2021·No. 3:20-cv-00673·Unknown

Opinion

! || Christian L. Moore, Esq. Dane A. Littlefield, Esq. 2 Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg 3 6005 Plumas Street, Third Floor Reno, NV 89519 4 } Telephone: (775) 786-6868 clm@lge.net; dal@lge.net Theodore E. Chrissinger, Esq. 6 Hoy Chrissinger Vallas 3 50 W. Liberty St., Suite 840 - Reno, Nevada 89501 g || Lelephone: (775) 786-8000 tchrissinger@nevadalaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff 10 GARY A. PULVER dba PULVER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 14 ] GARY A. PULVER dba PULVER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, an individual, Case. No.: 3:20-cv-00673-MMD-CLB 16 Honorable Miranda M. Du Plaintiff, 17 v. 18 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER BARRY KANE, an individual; ANNA 19 KANE, an individual; and 1059 LAKESHORE BOULEVARD LLC, a 20 Nevada limited liability company fka 1059 Lakeshore Drive LLC, Defendants. 93 1059 LAKESHORE BOULEVARD LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, 24 Counterclaimant, 25 v. 26 GARY A. PULVER dba PULVER 27 CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, an 28 individual, GRUNDY & EISENBERG

and ROES 1-50, inclusive,

3 GARY A. PULVER dba PULVER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, an 4 individual, 5 Third-Party Plaintiff, 6 Ill vy. 7 Ill CRUZ CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, g INC., a Nevada corporation, 9 Third-Party Defendant. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER, CONFIDENTIALITY 12 COMES NOW, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff GARY A. PULVER 13 doa PULVER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, by and through its counsel LEMONS, GRUNDY & 14 EISENBERG, Defendant/Counterclaimant 1059 LAKESHORE BOULEVARD, LLC and 15 Defendants BARRY KANE and ANNA KANE, by and through their counsel of record 16 MOUNTAINSIDE Law, and Third-Party Defendant CRUZ CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., 17 through its counsel, ERICKSON, THORPE & SWAINSTON, and hereby certify that they have 1g ||conferred amongst each other pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1) and hereby stipulate to the 19 following joint Stipulated Protective Order, Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure Agreement, 99 Subject to the approval of the Court. 1 1. Purpose. It is recognized that certain information that may be produced and 97 discussed in this litigation is deserving of protection under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) in that it may 53, || contain confidential, personal, or commercial information which is sensitive and private in nature 54 and therefore deserving of protection from disclosure and dissemination. This protective order 95 is intended to govern the use and dissemination of this confidential information which may be 56 contained in all documents and other discovery material, specifically including electronically »7 || Stored information (ESI) produced by the parties, whether informally or formally, and whether 5g || produced affirmatively by a party pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 or in response to interrogatories,

1 request for admissions, request for production of documents, or obtained or submitted to the court 2 through affidavit, designated record or other testimony, whether through deposition or otherwise, 3 obtained or submitted in this action. 4 A “Producing Party” or “Producing Parties” as used herein means any party and any non- 5 party that has produced documents pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including 6 by subpoena or similar process. 7 2. Definition of Confidential Information. Confidential information shall be 8 designated as such at the time of production or as soon as practicable and should be limited to 9 any information which a party reasonably and in good faith believes to contain or disclose 10 confidential, sensitive and private, trade secrets or other confidential research, development, 11 commercial or financial proprietary personal or business information of the party or of a third 12 party, that could not be independently obtained, and/or confidential, personal or business 13 information, the disclosure of which might reasonably pose a commercial disadvantage to the 14 ] owner or custodian of the information. 15 3. Limitation on Designation of Information. The parties shall only designate 16 information that is confidential if they have a reasonable and good faith belief that the 17 information should, in fact, be so designated. If the Court later determines that the parties did 18 not act reasonably or in good faith in making such a designation, the Court shall award to the 19 party opposing the designation that party’s reasonable attorneys’ fees in disputing the 20 designation; provided, however, that no party may challenge such a designation unless and until 21 that party has first made a reasonable good faith attempt to resolve the matter informally with the 22 designating party. If any party objects to the designation of “CONFIDENTIAL”, such party shall 23 state the objection in a letter to counsel for the producing party, setting forth the reasons that the 24 party believes the material should not be treated as confidential information. The producing party 25 shall respond, in writing, within ten days of receipt of the objection, setting forth the reasons the 26 producing party believes the material is confidential. Ifthe parties cannot resolve the objection, 27 the objecting party may then move the Court for an appropriate order regarding such designation. 28

1 Until such objection is resolved, the information shall be treated as confidential information and 2 remain subject to the Protective Order. 3 4, Method of Document Designation. Documents containing confidential 4 information may be so designated at the point of production or as soon thereafter as is practical. 5 Confidential information shall be identified by the designating producing party, on the first or 6 cover page of each document and each page thereafter which contains the confidential 7 information by the label, “CONFIDENTIAL.” 8 5. Designation of Deposition Testimony. Deposition testimony that the parties 9 reasonably believe will contain confidential information shall! only be taken in the presence of 10 the persons entitled to such information under this Order. Where practical, the record shall 11 identify those portions which relate to confidential information and that information will be 12 identified as such at the time the deposition is taken. At the request of the party claiming 13 confidentiality, the parties may make arrangements with the court reporter so that the portion of 14 the transcription in question can be separately bound and labeled as confidential. 15 6. Method of Exhibit Designation. Exhibits introduced at deposition or trial that 16 contain confidential information may be so designated by making a statement to that effect on 17 record at the time of their introduction. At the request of the party claiming confidentiality, 18 ] exhibits designated as containing confidential information shall be placed in sealed containers or 19 otherwise designated as such prior to being place in the Court file so as to ensure that they are 20 not placed within the public record. 21 7. Qualified Persons to Review Confidential Information. Confidential 22 information produced pursuant to this Order may be disclosed or made available only to the 23 persons set forth below (collectively “Qualified Persons”): 24 (a) the Court, jury, court personnel, and court reporters in connection with this 25 litigation; 26 (b) counsel for a party, including partners, associates, clerks, paralegals, 27 clerical and secretarial staff, and other support personnel employed or engaged by such counsel’s 28 firm;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pulver v. Kane, (D. Nev. 2021).

Pulver v. Kane (Pulver v. Kane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)