Pulver v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pulver v. Board of Education

80 A.D.2d 833, 436 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10651

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 2, 1981

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 80 A.D.2d 833 (Pulver v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pulver v. Board of Education, 80 A.D.2d 833, 436 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10651 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the respondent board of education to reinstate petitioner to a position as a senior high school foreign language teacher, pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 2510 of the Education Law, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 2, 1980, which dismissed the proceeding upon the ground that petitioner had failed to file a notice of claim. Judgment reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, arid matter remitted to Special Term for a determination on the merits. The notice of claim requirement in section 3813 of the Education Law does not apply to a proceeding in which the vindication of the public interest is sought in the enforcement of tenure rights (see Matter of Gross v Board of Educ., 73 AD2d 949; Matter of Tadken v Board of Educ., 65 AD2d 820, mot for lv to app den 46 NY2d 711). The concept of tenure rights includes the reinstatement provisions of section [834]*8342510 of the Education Law (cf. Matter of Silver v Board of Educ., 46 AD2d 427). Mangano, J.P., Cohalan, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the respondent board of education to reinstate petitioner to a position as a senior high school foreign language teacher, pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 2510 of the Education Law, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 2, 1980, which dismissed the proceeding upon the ground that petitioner had failed to file a notice of claim. Judgment reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, arid matter remitted to Special Term for a determination on the merits. The notice of claim requirement in section 3813 of the Education Law does not apply to a proceeding in which the vindication of the public interest is sought in the enforcement of tenure rights (see Matter of Gross v Board of Educ., 73 AD2d 949; Matter of Tadken v Board of Educ., 65 AD2d 820, mot for lv to app den 46 NY2d 711). The concept of tenure rights includes the reinstatement provisions of section [834]*8342510 of the Education Law (cf. Matter of Silver v Board of Educ., 46 AD2d 427). Mangano, J.P., Cohalan, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 A.D.2d 833, 436 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pulver-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack