Pulte v. Wayne Circuit Judge

47 Mich. 646
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 12, 1881
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 47 Mich. 646 (Pulte v. Wayne Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pulte v. Wayne Circuit Judge, 47 Mich. 646 (Mich. 1881).

Opinion

[See ante, p. 560.]

Where an appeal bond is defective or insufficient, the remedy is by-motion in the Supreme Court for leave to amend or file a new bond, and not by mandamus against the judge who approved it.

Motion for order to show cause.

Denied October 12.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coeling v. Barnard
124 N.W. 533 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1910)
Bock v. Sauk Center Grocery Co.
110 N.W. 257 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 Mich. 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pulte-v-wayne-circuit-judge-mich-1881.