Pullum v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Pullum v. State

282 S.W.3d 412, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 690, 2009 WL 1203361

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 5, 2009

DocketED 91402

StatusPublished

This text of 282 S.W.3d 412 (Pullum v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pullum v. State, 282 S.W.3d 412, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 690, 2009 WL 1203361 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dameion Pullum (Appellant) appeals from the motion court’s denial without an evidentiary hearing of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035. 1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting *413 forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2003, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dameion Pullum (Appellant) appeals from the motion court’s denial without an evidentiary hearing of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035. 1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting *413 forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2003, unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 S.W.3d 412, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 690, 2009 WL 1203361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pullum-v-state-moctapp-2009.