Pullum v. State

282 S.W.3d 412, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 690, 2009 WL 1203361
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pullum v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 169
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 5, 2009·No. ED 91402·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dameion Pullum (Appellant) appeals from the motion court’s denial without an evidentiary hearing of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035. 1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting *413 forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2003, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pullum v. State, 282 S.W.3d 412, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 690, 2009 WL 1203361 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

282 S.W.3d 412 (Pullum v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.