Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Martin
22 S.E. 702, 95 Ga. 320
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Martin. Read the opinion of the Court — 29 L.R.A. 498 →
Opinion
Upon the exception to the order overruling the motion for nonsuit, brought up by bill of exceptions to the last term of this court, and which, by consent, was continued to be argued and considered along with the main case, it is unnecessary to do more than refer to the discussion of the evidence as stated in’ the opinion in the case of Pullman’s Palace Car Company v. Martin, this day decided. Ante, 316. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Martin, 22 S.E. 702, 95 Ga. 320 (Ga. 1895).
22 S.E. 702 (Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.