Pullman's Palace-Car Co. v. American Loan & Trust Co.

Eighth Circuit

Pullman's Palace-Car Co. v. American Loan & Trust Co.

84 F. 18, 28 C.C.A. 263, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2172

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedDecember 6, 1897

DocketNo. 912

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 84 F. 18 (Pullman's Palace-Car Co. v. American Loan & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pullman's Palace-Car Co. v. American Loan & Trust Co., 84 F. 18, 28 C.C.A. 263, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2172 (8th Cir. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Notwithstanding the ingenióos and able argument of counsel for appellant, we are unable to perceive in this case other than an effort to establish as a preferential debt a claim for the stipulated compensation for the use of cars, or, as it is generally called, “car rental.” Under the authority of Thomas v. Car Co., 149 U. S. 95, 13 Sup. Ct. 824, this cannot be done. The order is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Notwithstanding the ingenióos and able argument of counsel for appellant, we are unable to perceive in this case other than an effort to establish as a preferential debt a claim for the stipulated compensation for the use of cars, or, as it is generally called, “car rental.” Under the authority of Thomas v. Car Co., 149 U. S. 95, 13 Sup. Ct. 824, this cannot be done. The order is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 F. 18, 28 C.C.A. 263, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pullmans-palace-car-co-v-american-loan-trust-co-ca8-1897.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack