Home/Court of Appeals of Texas/Pullman v. Brill, Brooks

Pullman v. Brill, Brooks

763 S.W.2d 505, 1988 Tex. App. LEXIS 3261
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 22, 1988
DocketNo. C14-87-468-CV
StatusPublished

This text of 763 S.W.2d 505 (Pullman v. Brill, Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pullman v. Brill, Brooks, 763 S.W.2d 505, 1988 Tex. App. LEXIS 3261 (Tex. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

OPINION

CANNON, Justice.

On November 23, 1988, we held that if appellee, Brill, Brooks, Powell and Yount, filed a remittitur of $5,000 the judgment would be affirmed as modified.

The suggested remittitur has been filed. Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is modified by deducting $5,000 from the $10,000 awarded to appellees under special issue 7(d) for legal fees if application for writ of error is granted by the Texas Supreme Court.

The judgment in favor of appellees is otherwise affirmed.

See also, 766 S.W.2d 527.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pullman v. Brill, Brooks, Powell & Yount
766 S.W.2d 527 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
763 S.W.2d 505, 1988 Tex. App. LEXIS 3261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pullman-v-brill-brooks-texapp-1988.