Pullman Co. v. Vinegar Bend Lumber Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Pullman Co. v. Vinegar Bend Lumber Co.

191 Ill. App. 93, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 914

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided January 5, 1915·No. Gen. No. 19,993·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

5. Interpleader, § 5*—when MU sufficient. A bill showing that1 a fund due for lumber sold was claimed by all of several parties against whom the bill demanded relief, that it had a common source in the lumber or sale thereof, that complainant was not interested therein and was indifferent among the complainants, contained sufficient elements essential to the equitable remedy of interpleader. 6. Interpleader, § 14*—when cross-Mil unnecessary. A cross-bill is unnecessary for the assertion and adjustment of a claim of one interpleading, the answer being sufficient.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

5. Interpleader, § 5*—when MU sufficient. A bill showing that1 a fund due for lumber sold was claimed by all of several parties against whom the bill demanded relief, that it had a common source in the lumber or sale thereof, that complainant was not interested therein and was indifferent among the complainants, contained sufficient elements essential to the equitable remedy of interpleader. 6. Interpleader, § 14*—when cross-Mil unnecessary. A cross-bill is unnecessary for the assertion and adjustment of a claim of one interpleading, the answer being sufficient.

Pullman Co. v. Vinegar Bend Lumber Co., 191 Ill. App. 93, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 914 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

191 Ill. App. 93 (Pullman Co. v. Vinegar Bend Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related