Home/Appellate Court of Illinois/Pullman Co. v. Vinegar Bend Lumber Co.

Pullman Co. v. Vinegar Bend Lumber Co.

191 Ill. App. 93, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 914
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJanuary 5, 1915
DocketGen. No. 19,993
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 191 Ill. App. 93 (Pullman Co. v. Vinegar Bend Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pullman Co. v. Vinegar Bend Lumber Co., 191 Ill. App. 93, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 914 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

5. Interpleader, § 5*—when MU sufficient. A bill showing that1 a fund due for lumber sold was claimed by all of several parties against whom the bill demanded relief, that it had a common source in the lumber or sale thereof, that complainant was not interested therein and was indifferent among the complainants, contained sufficient elements essential to the equitable remedy of interpleader. 6. Interpleader, § 14*—when cross-Mil unnecessary. A cross-bill is unnecessary for the assertion and adjustment of a claim of one interpleading, the answer being sufficient.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Union Indemnity Co. v. Jeschke
267 Ill. App. 113 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 Ill. App. 93, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pullman-co-v-vinegar-bend-lumber-co-illappct-1915.