Pullman Co. v. Anderson

81 So. 276, 119 Miss. 791
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1919·No. No. 20553·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judges are equally divided on the question of the appellant’s liability, but all agree that, conceding liability, the verdict is grossly excessive. If a re-mittitur of all in excess of three hundred dollars be entered, the judgment of the court below will be affirmed; otherwise, it will be reversed and remanded.

Affirmed conditionally.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pullman Co. v. Anderson, 81 So. 276, 119 Miss. 791 (Mich. 1919).

81 So. 276 (Pullman Co. v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.