Pulliam v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Pulliam v. State

121 S.E. 712, 31 Ga. App. 570, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 59

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 17, 1924

Docket15028

StatusPublished

This text of 121 S.E. 712 (Pulliam v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pulliam v. State, 121 S.E. 712, 31 Ga. App. 570, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 59 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodwoeth, J.

The case of Pulliam v. Jenkins, 157 Ga. 18 (121 S. E. 679), was a habeas-corptis proceeding growing out of an attempt to enforce the sentence in this ease. The facts and issues in that case are practically the same as in this one. Under the principles announced in the rulings in that case, the court did not err in any of the rulings of which complaint is made in the bill of exceptions in this case, nor in “amending and modifying” the sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodwoeth, J.

The case of Pulliam v. Jenkins, 157 Ga. 18 (121 S. E. 679), was a habeas-corptis proceeding growing out of an attempt to enforce the sentence in this ease. The facts and issues in that case are practically the same as in this one. Under the principles announced in the rulings in that case, the court did not err in any of the rulings of which complaint is made in the bill of exceptions in this case, nor in “amending and modifying” the sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 S.E. 712, 31 Ga. App. 570, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pulliam-v-state-gactapp-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack