Pulley v. Perfect

30 Ind. 379
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1868·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Ray, C. J.

The appellee filed against the estate of which the appellant was administrator a claim for allowance.

The statement consisted of a copy of anote given to the appellee by the decedent on whose effects the administration was had, and was accompanied by an affidavit that the [380]*380claim was just and true and that there was no offset, as required by the statute. A demurrer was filed and overruled. Judgment for the appellee. The statement was sufficient. Crabb v. Atwood, 10 Ind. 322.

J. Green, for appellant. N. B. Overman and G. W. Lowley, for appellee.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pulley v. Perfect, 30 Ind. 379 (Ind. 1868).

30 Ind. 379 (Pulley v. Perfect) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garrigus v. Home Frontier & Foreign Missionary Society
28 N.E. 1009 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1891)
Wolfe v. Wilsey
28 N.E. 1004 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1891)
Taggart v. Tevanny
27 N.E. 511 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1891)
Estate of Le Clerc
5 Coffey 297 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1887)
Price v. Jones
5 N.E. 683 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1886)
Noble v. McGinnis
55 Ind. 528 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1877)
Smith v. Denman
48 Ind. 65 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1874)
Stanford v. Stanford
42 Ind. 485 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1873)
Hyatt v. Mavity
34 Ind. 415 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1870)