Pulley v. Perfect

Indiana Supreme Court

Pulley v. Perfect

30 Ind. 379

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 15, 1868

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 30 Ind. 379 (Pulley v. Perfect) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pulley v. Perfect, 30 Ind. 379 (Ind. 1868).

Pincite

Opinion

Ray, C. J.

The appellee filed against the estate of which the appellant was administrator a claim for allowance.

The statement consisted of a copy of anote given to the appellee by the decedent on whose effects the administration was had, and was accompanied by an affidavit that the [380]*380claim was just and true and that there was no offset, as required by the statute. A demurrer was filed and overruled. Judgment for the appellee. The statement was sufficient. Crabb v. Atwood, 10 Ind. 322.

J. Green, for appellant. N. B. Overman and G. W. Lowley, for appellee.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray, C. J.

The appellee filed against the estate of which the appellant was administrator a claim for allowance.

The statement consisted of a copy of anote given to the appellee by the decedent on whose effects the administration was had, and was accompanied by an affidavit that the [380]*380claim was just and true and that there was no offset, as required by the statute. A demurrer was filed and overruled. Judgment for the appellee. The statement was sufficient. Crabb v. Atwood, 10 Ind. 322.

J. Green, for appellant. N. B. Overman and G. W. Lowley, for appellee.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 Ind. 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pulley-v-perfect-ind-1868.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack