Pulles v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pulles v. State

641 So. 2d 521, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8559, 1994 WL 466375

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 31, 1994·No. No. 94-885·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order denying the motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) is affirmed. Although the State concedes a 15-point error on the guidelines scoresheet, appellant is entitled to no relief because the correction would not change his guidelines range. See Orsi v. State, 515 So.2d 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). We do not reach appellant’s argument (raised for the first time on appeal) that there is error in the scoring of his prior record because that argument was not presented to the trial court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order denying the motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) is affirmed. Although the State concedes a 15-point error on the guidelines scoresheet, appellant is entitled to no relief because the correction would not change his guidelines range. See Orsi v. State, 515 So.2d 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). We do not reach appellant’s argument (raised for the first time on appeal) that there is error in the scoring of his prior record because that argument was not presented to the trial court.

Affirmed.

Pulles v. State, 641 So. 2d 521, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8559, 1994 WL 466375 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

641 So. 2d 521 (Pulles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related