Pulles v. State

641 So. 2d 521, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8559, 1994 WL 466375
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 31, 1994
DocketNo. 94-885
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 641 So. 2d 521 (Pulles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pulles v. State, 641 So. 2d 521, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8559, 1994 WL 466375 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order denying the motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) is affirmed. Although the State concedes a 15-point error on the guidelines scoresheet, appellant is entitled to no relief because the correction would not change his guidelines range. See Orsi v. State, 515 So.2d 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). We do not reach appellant’s argument (raised for the first time on appeal) that there is error in the scoring of his prior record because that argument was not presented to the trial court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hernandez
658 So. 2d 620 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
641 So. 2d 521, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8559, 1994 WL 466375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pulles-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.