Pullen v. United States

140 S. Ct. 814, 205 L. Ed. 2d 503
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 13, 2020
DocketNo. 19-5219
StatusPublished

This text of 140 S. Ct. 814 (Pullen v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pullen v. United States, 140 S. Ct. 814, 205 L. Ed. 2d 503 (U.S. 2020).

Opinion

Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Ginsburg joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari:

I dissent for the reasons set out in Brown v. United States , 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 14, 202 L.Ed.2d 302 (2018) ( Sotomayor, J., dissenting).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. United States
139 S. Ct. 14 (Supreme Court, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 S. Ct. 814, 205 L. Ed. 2d 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pullen-v-united-states-scotus-2020.